Hello! It's just Jordan with this week's Wednesday review. As the big ratings week is all over now, this week is dealing with the aftermath.
In the opening scene, Beth is discussing how she always squeezes the toothpaste from the bottom of the tube, in order to get as much use out of it as possible. And that is what tonight's episode did. Every thin drop of story was wrung out in what was most definitely a bridge episode.
The bulk of tonight's episode was, of course, dedicated to the aftermath of the discovery of Callum's body. However, I can see this aftermath going on for way too long and becoming afterlongdivision. Jason bumps into Sarah on the Street, having been released from questioning and shouts the odds. She can't even look him in the eye as she brushes her way past. Todd advises him that threatening people is not the best way to prove his innocence and later seeks out Sarah to talk to her himself. However, her mind is elsewhere and she does not want to be questioned by her ex-boyfriend of many moons ago, especially when today, 1st June, should have been the twelfth birthday of their son Billy. It is after this that things take a turn for the worst, and the downright strange. While out on the cobbles, Billy (the Vicar one) tries to strike up a conversation with her but she's distracted when her mind sees something. Shoving baby Harry into the arms of Billy, she runs off into the next street, scream-crying Callum's name. Surprisingly, Callum is nowhere to be seen. She's imagined him- or as she later puts it, she's seen his ghost. Todd has become heavily involved, obviously wanting to clear his brother's name, and pays another visit to Sarah that evening. She lets him into the flat and begins to spout a bunch of claptrap about hidden worlds and ghosts. She's started to believe that people can see the dead. When Todd tries to make sense of what she's saying, she bursts into a fiery meltdown and throws him out of the flat, leaving him shocked and suspicious. She even does that very soap thing of slamming the door and proceeding to slide down it, her face awash with tears. I'd love to know whether that particular action is written in the script. I've seen countless episodes close with that now cliché "slide down the door while crying" thing.
"Did you see someone?" "See who?"
|
"You not having hair of the dog, Sinead?" "Sorry?" "Oh well, I heard you were three sheets to the wind last night" |
"On a day for getting my priorities right... I bought you this" |
"Well, you know what they say. If something's too good to be true, it usually is" |
Honestly - I didn't enjoy this episode. It was weak in story and as threadbare as Liz McDonald's tights. Sarah's apparent insanity is interesting though and Tina O'Brien must be praised, not only for her performance in this episode but throughout the whole of Sarah's latest trauma. I am also very much enjoying Todd as of late. Oh, and Todd and Billy, my two favourite Corrie men, seem to be growing closer, something which I applaud wholeheartedly. There was some good comedy from Mary and Norris, but I'm not really slating this roof storyline to go anywhere. Also- one thing that bothered me about tonight's episode was the timeframe. I'd assumed that tonight's episode was set on Tuesday, as Chesney kept making reference to the night before. However, it was most certainly set on Wednesday, as Sarah pointed out. Does this mean that Monday's episode was set on Tuesday? But I'm sure they made reference to the Bank Holiday. I don't know. My head hurts now!
As always,
Thanks for reading!
Jordan
Follow me on Twitter! @JordanLloyd39
NEW!
The Little Book of Carla Connor
A Decade in the Life of a Soap Queen
An unofficial Coronation Street companion book
Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter
Download our free App | Visit Corrie.net
Please read our advice for leaving comments on the Coronation Street Blog
All original work on the Coronation Street Blog is covered by a Creative Commons License
11 comments:
I have to agree that I'd like to see Todd and Billy get together. They seem infinitely more compatible than Sean and Billy... as odd as that may sound.
a wierd eрisode - who's writing this rubbish and when is Kate taking over???
Hate personality changes made to suit a story but that's what happened to our Eva. For characters, integrity = depth. That whole story was so over used it actually put me to sleep. In the morning. After a coffee. Boo!
My spidey sense says that Alistair was hired by Mr. Phelan. TG for Roy, Billy, Sarah and Todd. Again.
Sinead and Chesney...please....The moribund Chesney has inexplicably won the hearts of two of the best looking girls on the street (bombshell sexpot Katie and classic American girl-next-door look Sinead) and he STILL looks like he's at Schmeichel's deathbed. To have Sinead endlessly fretting over what she did wrong in this relationship is just masochistic. Even her brief friendship with the hottie in the wheelchair at the hospital had more spark than her relationship with Chesney! Put me out my misery please...they are so stupid together. Chesney needs someone loud and brash and similar in style and looks, like Gemma--who actually WOULD be grateful if he brought her home a free kebab as an apology; Sinead needs someone more sensitive and thoughtful who would appreciate her romantic nature and idealism (eg. a millenial version of Spider N.) jeanie
I also agree that Todd and Billy are more suited rather than Billy and Sean.Sean can be self centered, selfish and petty as he was recently to Jenny after she saved Jack Webster from being hit by a tram.
I may be in the minority, but I don't think Cathy and Roy are a good couple either.She seemed happier about the engagement then he does.
I think being a honourable man,Roy only accepted her proposal because she was accidently hit by Carla.
I would love to see Sylvia return and meet Cathy and Alex and see what her son is getting into.
So true about Chesney - no offense to the actor but it defies belief that the character Ches would win those two girls. The character is a wet blanket.
On a side note - I respect that the show doesn't make actors do a lot of kissing and sex scenes. But sometimes seeing a hug instead of a kiss between the characters is more jarring and weird. For example, if you become engaged, would you not plant a kiss on your fiancé instead of going in for a side hug? I think a quick kiss between Cathy and Roy would not be inappropriate. Or a kiss between Ches and Sinead upon arriving home after weeks away.
The scriptwriters are letting Chesney down. He had such a spark and a mischievous streak as a little boy but they've made him too serious and boring as he's grown up. Sinead deserves better. Pity Craig is too young for her! And how could Chesney afford to go to Portugal for a month? (or was it longer?) Katie's Mum may have paid for the flight, but what about his loss of earnings?
I think Craig is Sinead's cousin (or something?) so that would be a different story line all together!
So is Jason still mad at Liz? Or has the whole murder investigation thing made him forget about Tony passing away?
I'm with Anon above - bring back Sylvia! The street needs a battleaxe!
Lynne from Ottawa -- Didn't Todd steal a boyfriend from Sean some years ago? If so, history would seem to repeat itself. I agree with Anon and C in Canada, bring back Sylvia -- we need those oneliners that only a battleaxe like her can deliver!
Post a Comment