I've been musing about George and all this palaver over his trying to take Simon away from Peter. Is he wrong to do it? Is he right but just used the wrong methods? Are his concerns justified or are they an excuse? Will Eve tear George a new one for doing all this behind her back? How will it all come out? I had some ideas and speculation and have written about it over here.
Cosy crimes and gritty sagas by Corrie Blog editor Glenda, published by Headline. Click pic below!
Saturday, 13 March 2010
George takes the cake, and the child
I've been musing about George and all this palaver over his trying to take Simon away from Peter. Is he wrong to do it? Is he right but just used the wrong methods? Are his concerns justified or are they an excuse? Will Eve tear George a new one for doing all this behind her back? How will it all come out? I had some ideas and speculation and have written about it over here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GRITTY SAGAS BY CORRIE BLOG EDITOR GLENDA YOUNG, PUBLISHED BY HEADLINE. CLICK PIC BELOW!
You might also like...
-
Wednesday 19 February 2025 Ryan tells Daisy that it’s time she paid Carla back the money she owes her and fast. Ryan overhears Bobby on the... -
Good day. After weeks of no Friday episodes we are back to normal tonight. The drama tonight centres largely around the Platts, the Webste...
-
Monday 17 February 2025 When Bobby reveals his plans to start visiting his Dad again, Carla warns him to tread carefully. When Rob calls Ma... -
Here are the major storylines for the week ahead on Coronation Street, all wrapped up nicely in 50 words or less. Monday February 24 to Thur... -
Here are the major storylines for the week ahead on Coronation Street, all wrapped up nicely in 50 words or less. Monday February 17 to Frid... -
Tuesday 18 February 2025 Kit starts an investigation into what happened to Rob. Is Rob still alive and will Kit be able to get to the bottom... -
Friday 14 February 2025 Andy talks David through the details of the robbery, but it’s clear David’s not made his mind up. Nick has a propos... -
Welcome to the cobbles - how are you enjoying your time here? I absolutely love it! Everyone's really welcoming. It really is everyth... -
The news is finally out - how are you enjoying your time on Coronation Street? It's been so muc...
-
With new producer Kate Brooks' name now appearing in Corrie's credits, it marks the beginning of a new era for the soap after her ap...
Coronation Street Books for Fans
GRITTY SAGAS BY CORRIE BLOG EDITOR GLENDA YOUNG, PUBLISHED BY HEADLINE. CLICK PIC BELOW!
7 comments:
George supposedly never had time for his daughter, Lucy. But what about his wife, Eve? They appear to have been married for a long time, and she seems a kind, loving person - so how was it possible for George not to see Lucy?
I think we all thought George was going to be a villan but it turns out he is just a bombastic Grandad, a man used to getting his own way by fair means or foul. I think he thought he had messed up with his daughter, Lucy, and wanted to make amends through Simon by "giving him a good life". Peter has just given him all the ammunition by keep going back to the drink and who says he won't do it again, he is a bit of a loser. I hope this is not the end we see of Anthony Valentine because he has been great and I would like to see him and Eve popping up every now and again like Jack and Connie.
I think it was more to do with Lucy refusing to see George from what i got out of this.
George may well have been right to have his concerns about Peter/Simon, but the way he went about it was downright evil. I'm going to be gutted if he turns out to have gone soft/reconciles with Peter/Ken, as it looked very much like he was doing in the last episode - I hope he has further villainy up his sleeve. It'll be much more entertaining.
I can understand why George is doing this but behind even his wifes back shows just how determined and actually blinkered he has become.
He wasn't there for Lucy when she was little, that is established. Character wise his actios have actually been consistent and certainly not rash. Initially he was trying to help Simon indirectly by supporting Peter and Leanne. He ploughed a small fortune into the bar of course. Also he was very pushy about the private schooling and even (at such a late stage) paid for Peter's rehab treatment.
A lot of this was down to his enthusiasm at discovering he actually had a grandson of course. He desperately wants to play a very much active role in his upbringing (which i hope he still can).
His conflict with Ken was predictable but actually quite apt in many ways. It helped him get closer to Peter and thus to Simon. It also showed some of Ken's true colours that have exasparated Deirdre for so many years.
He showed a devious (or determined) side however, by manipuLAting Leanne when she very much needed support, in taking Simon away. After actually doing a much needed turn in having Simon over, he quickly abused this position and decided he could do a better job of caring for him.
This, as we know, is very short sighted. Particularly when you consider he was a struggling father himself, with demons, like Peter. He wasn't there for his own daughter. Did he not stop to think that his inherently selfish actions where not only to Simon's detriment but also forcing his own shortcomings as a father onto Peter as another?
I hope to see his relationship with Eve tested through this storyline and i also hope that they both become permanent additions to the cast.
So often with storylines like these, the character is introduced for the short term effect of the storyline, rather than long term to the benefit of the show. Stephanie Beacham being a good recent example.
A fantastic storyline. Consistent in its execution and in my view, a highlight of the rather underwhelming Kim Crowther era.
Yeah, George can't "rest in peace" one day knowing how he abandoned his daughter, and has made it his quest to care for Simon.
This was a good storyline, yes. Although, I feel so bad for poor little Simon, hopefully he can resume a normal life after.
Any alternastive would be better for the child rather than living an a stinking smoke filled room above a bookie's with a hopeless alcoholic loser of a father.
Post a Comment