Cosy crimes and gritty sagas by Corrie Blog editor Glenda, published by Headline. Click pic below!

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

My disappointment in Dennis

Well, Dennis Tanner has gone! Will he be back? Who knows?

I have to say that since Dennis was re-introduced into Corrie over three years ago, I have been very disappointed at the way his character has been dealt with. And this is no fault of Philip Lowrie. It's in the hands of the powers that be. Here are some of my thoughts on the weaknesses of the charatcer.

His re-introduction

When I heard the news that Dennis Tanner was being re-introduced, I was a little apprehensive. Yes, I was thrilled they were thinking of bringing him back, but yet I questioned why? There were plenty of other characters to re-introduce, why Dennis Tanner? He hadn't appeared since 1968 and only two characters, three at a push would remember him.

Then we got more info on his comeback. He would return as a tramp which was an interesting angle. You would expect that maybe Emily would find him prowling around the charity shop. But oh no, it was Rita who found him while volunteering in a homeless shelter. The producers made a mountain out of a molehill, quite frankly, of their friendship. Yes, Rita was introduced as Dennis' friend in 1964, but that was about it. For me, it would have been better for Emily or Ken to come across him and then bring him home and for Rita to recognise him. What was also weird was that Dennis didn't comment on how the street had changed since he left. He didn't comment how the Rovers had changed - how the snug or select wasn't there any more.

Lack of historical references

As I said, I was apprehensive about his return. But what I was looking forward to were references to the past. Dennis was another link to the Corrie of the 1960s along with Ken and Emily. While we got told about Elsie's fate and a reference to Martha Longhurst, I have no recollection of Dennis making any references to past characters. He could've talked about Jack and Annie Walker, the snug trio, Albert Tatlock or Lucille Hewitt. Considering his links with Gamma Garments, he never talked about Swindley with Emily. He never discussed Emily having finally got married after years of being a spinster. 

His lack of scenes with Ken were a disappointment as well. Considering he was due to ruffle Ken's feathers, no such scenes were shown. There were two years before Ken left for Canada, so there were enough opportunities. Where were the scenes where Dennis and Ken reminisced about the past and about Elsie, Frank and Ida, David and Valerie? We never saw Dennis talk to Peter about his mum. A missed opportunity.

Why didn't Linda Cheveski re-appear? Or what about a reference to Dennis' first wife Jenny?

Confinement to Rita

This was the biggest mistake they did. Since 2011, his scenes have mainly been with Rita. But I don't know why the producers chose to confine him to just Rita. They could have always maintained Rita and Dennis' friendship, like her friendship with Alf, while Dennis could communicate with other characters. I was pleased when the producers recognised the ironic link that Eileen lived at Elsie's house and that Elsie's maiden name was also Grimshaw. And it was nice how Julie took Dennis in recently. 

I was also unhappy that they married Dennis and Rita. Rita mentioned time and again that she had always wanted to be Mrs Tanner. No reference was made before and it was odd considering Rita always said that her true love was Len. For years, she refused to remarry because she still loved Len. 

There was a lot of potential for Dennis to be linked with other characters. Yes he had a friendship with Sylvia and he ran off with Gloria, but what about Audrey? They could've talked about hairdressing - Dennis was interested at one time! And  despite Gail being Elsie's lodger, no scenes were done between the characters. He became a lollipop man which gave him a story with Steve, but all was forgotten.

While Rita had always had a fun-loving and humorous nature, her marriage to Dennis made her a miserable and boring shrew. When married to Len she could be a nag which was justified, but it was a change of personality for her to be so horrible to Dennis. It was no surprise that they finally separated but it was a shame that no effort was made to portray an old aged married couple. Not many have been portrayed in soaps so it would've been a change but alas the producers didn't have time. 

Ruination of a classic Corrie character

Maybe it was a mistake bringing him back. Too much time had passed. Although when they re-introduced Jed Stone, they didn't make a mess of things but he wasn't there long! Dennis could've brought some humour back to the OAP section of the show after the deaths of Blanche and Betty and would've been a brilliant double act with Sylvia. 

They made him totally dependant on Rita which was an error as he was a pensioner so received a pension. When he courted Rita, she was sweet but when they married, she turned into a harridan. He became henpecked like Jack Duckworth and Stan Ogden.

If not making him henpecked was enough, they made him an adulterer as well - running off with Gloria. He returned a desperate man but by the end he even retorted to even stealing money from The Kabin. 

It was a shame that he was axed - a real shame. What will Rita do now? Get a divorce and revert back to Sullivan? Who knows? Rita's not having the best luck with her old friends is she? She's fallen out with Bet Lynch, Alec Gilroy and Sharon Gaskell and now Dennis! Thank goodness she's still got Mavis!

You rarely disappoint me Corrie, but this time you have.

What about you? Were you disappointed with how Dennis was dealt with? Did you have hopes for him? Leave your comments!

Download our App | Follow on Twitter @CoroStreetBlog | Like on Facebook

Creative Commons Licence
All original work on the Coronation Street Blog is covered by a Creative Commons License


Humpty Dumpty said...

One of the great mysteries of the universe. There were tons of possible stories for Dennis and we badly need a loveable rogue on the Street. He shouldn't have married Rita but flitted from one adoring lady to another. He could have built up a business with Chesney on the markets; he might have made some extra income at the races. He certainly should have had several run-ins with Ken, almost coming to blows and having to be separated before they hurt themselves. What a waste of comic potential. Maybe there's more to this than we're being told. I wonder how much influence the advertisers have on story lines. Was Dennis just one elderly resident too many?

Shannon Elliott said...

I, for one , will miss Dennis. :(

Anonymous said...

Very well put Llifon, I agree with all your points hadn't realised he was there 3 years! To be fair I spent all of 2011 seriously ill so that year's a little fuzzy . Such a shame he was shoved in a corner with Rita and squandered --Smelloid

njblas said...

Excellent post and I agree 100% with everything you say. What a terrible way to treat a Corrie legend - Dennis rarely shone because he wasn't given the opportunity to do so. Having him hovering around ineffectually was a terrible waste of Philip Lowrie's talent. They should have utilised the opportunity to explore the marriage of a couple coming together later in life, but I guess this would have been perceived as not 'explosive' or 'edge of your seat' enough. Why did they bring him back? If they had no plans for him, they should have just brought him in on a short-term contract with a strong storyline, then let him leave with dignity once it had run its course. The disregard Stuart Blackburn shows for viewers, and his failure to grasp what Corrie is all about, is strongly in evidence here. he should be the one shown the door, not Dennis. Has he seen the ratings lately? They speak volumes:(

Julie Gelder said...

Very well put - I agree 100%. Such a waste.

Dilly Daydream said...

I was thrilled to bits when I heard Dennis Tanner was coming back, he was always one of my favourite characters. But the way the character has been treated has been nothing short of disgusting and disrespectful.

Philip Lowrie, you deserved so much better and I am really sorry to see you go.

Frosty the Snowman said...

Well everyone knows Frosty is disgusted at the way this character was written and treated and yes what a missed opportunity. I suspect the writers are about 20 years old and dont have a clue. Absolutely no interaction with Gail who was close to Elsie and wasnt Nick even Elsie's godchild? I am afraid there is no quality of writing and research any longer, just the producers pets shoved in our faces all the time - Stella and now the Windasses and just "sensationalism" with non stop sex and fights and nastiness. Dennis's "exit" was an undigified skulking off with the now pretty dislikeable Rita's shrill screeching in his ears and the ever reptilian Norris feeling sorry for himself after he was quite deservedly punched. I feel that Corrie has rapidly lost the charm that it had in its heydey and have missed a chance to bring some of it back. Good luck Phillip you are a great actor and its their loss.

Carry On Blogging! said...

A brilliant blog and I agree with every point you make. If only they'd listen

John McE said...

I agree with everything above, but for me the worst thing by far was having take money from the till right at the end. It feels like the current producer just didn't like the character (or actor?) and wanted to make sure he couldn't return.

It's a crying shame, and a complete waste of a terrific older character.

The only good thing was that Norris finally got the punch he deserved. It was long, long overdue.

Meanwhile, back to more endless Windass misery, the unlikable Asian family, and the unbearable Maddie and Sophie.

Anonymous said...

I'm very disappointed. At any point in those three years they could have made more of Dennis, but chose not to. Why bring him back at all?

Dilly Daydream said...

Yes, I agree John McE, great to see Norris get his come-uppance, pity Dennis didn't knock him out!

Adam said...

Excellent blog post. I can't believe they've axed him. So much potential but the writers clearly don't give a damn. I'm really disappointed with Corrie now - they've never given up on a great character like Dennis before. :(

I only hope he returns in the future.

Anonymous said...

I find it's ironic that on one hand,there are complaints about too much nastiness and violence and on the other hand,people are happy that Dennis who leaves as a thief and a conman punched Norris whose only crime was telling his friend Rita that she was being conned by Dennis the man who supposedly loved her?That being said,I am disappointed in the way Dennis was wasted on the Street and I wnder if he was only brought back to justify storylines for Rita?

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 21:04

Spot on mate!

Anonymous said...

A waste of what could have been a decent character; however, his relationship with Rita was not properly explored.

Aside from this sensationalist nonsense of late he was rarely in it so, i't's daft to pretend his leaving is a great loss.

For most of his three years, he was little more than a highly paid extra.

I agree though that he had potential.


You might also like...