Cassie Williams is a barrister who has run a number of rape trials this year. She's given vent to her frustrations about the legal inaccuracies shown in Carla Connor's rape trial on Coronation Street.
Read it here.
Follow the Coronation Street Blog on Twitter and Facebook
Monday, 6 February 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You might also like...
-
Coronation Street viewers were shocked on Wednesday night when they discovered that the newest member of the Driscoll family, 15 year...
-
Friday 21 November 2025 TRACY PUSHES ABI OVER THE EDGE When a glum Abi admits Jack snubbed her on the street, Carl gives her a hug. In the R...
-
Here are the major storylines for the week ahead on Coronation Street, all wrapped up nicely in 50 words or less. Monday 24 to Friday 28 Nov...
-
//Warning I do not like this story.// Theo brings home a huge selection of pastries and talks Todd into eating them. Once Todd is full The...
-
Wednesday 19 November 2025 THREE’S A CROWD FOR TODD Theo prepares breakfast for Todd and blames his fondness for junk food for his poor deci...
-
Monday 24 November 2025 BECKY FIGHTS FIRE WITH FIRE Becky reveals she’s been sent a funeral wreath with the message ‘Rest in Peace - Again!’...
-
I never really get people falling asleep on the sofa and not waking up 'til morning. Don't they awake at 2 a.m. needing the loo? E...
-
You'd think by now that Carla and Lisa would have learned not to engage in breakfast smoochies. It's like Chief Gordon putting the...
-
With Carla having told Lisa their relationship is over, where is Lisa’s head at, does she still think she can talk her back round? Does she ...
-
Now then, if I had a penny for each time I've been asked this question, I'd have, well, I'd have a lot of pennies. This is by fa...

7 comments:
it was writing in all the lies with Carla and peter that caused the verdict to swing franks way,
Had the trial been written more accurately, it would have been a snoozer. Carla is a totally unsympathetic character, a snobby serial home wrecker with no friends and a weakness for drink. The only way to make the trial work, dramatically, was via all the OTT nonsense. Had she kept her hands off Peter, remained friends with Leanne and shared her struggle with therapy instead of running of to LA, then, maybe, a realistic trial would have worked. As it is, I just don't care, and would rather see Dierdre and Ken's struggle with their horrible offspring.
I also think, or at least hope, the audience can distinguish between reality and television.
When have the writers ever bothered with legal accuracies?
Whatever moves the storyline to the conclusion they want regardless of how lame it is, for example buying a business or a house in five minutes without ever leaving the street, getting a job or renting a flat on the street when you've only just arrived on the street.
Legality has nothing to do with it and yet they try to tell us that it is an accurate account of life in that part of Britain.
Soaps used to send out a message that if you committed a crime you wouldnt get away with it, but things have now changed and its all about ratings and sensationalism. Having Cheryl go back to her wife beater husband and having Tracy let out of prison after bashing her boyfriend's head in without learning any lessons as examples. It was totally ridiculous and unbelievable that Peter couldnt keep it in his pants for a few days until after the trial.
I do agree that with rape trials, they have a greater responsibility to at least *try* to make it accurate. Yes, it's fiction, but given the floods of phone calls that various help lines have gotten after certain storylines (Whitney and Kat in EE for one), soaps have a responsibility to try to portray stories like this accurately..
Rebecca in TO
Most people do not have experience of the courts and so will just imagine that victims are routinely harrassed by their attackers outside court and the defence barrister in court. Why should they think that Coronation Street is just lying about this?
After the trial the prosecution barrister said that it's hard enough to get women to report rape as it is. The writers must be very proud that they have contributed to making it even harder. I won't be participating in voting for Coronation Street to get any awards, except one for helping even more rapists to get away with it.
As someone who works in a court please be assured that defence QC's are not ever allowed to speak to rape victims like that and they give their evidence with no members of the public present
Routine harassment right outside the court building wouldn't be tolerated either
This storyline was enough to put real rape victims off reporting their crime!!!
Post a Comment