Read it here.
Follow the Coronation Street Blog on Twitter and Facebook
Cosy crimes and gritty sagas by Corrie Blog editor Glenda, published by Headline. Click pic below!
Monday, 6 February 2012
"Shame on you, Corrie" says real-life rape trial lawyer
Read it here.
Follow the Coronation Street Blog on Twitter and Facebook
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GRITTY SAGAS BY CORRIE BLOG EDITOR GLENDA YOUNG, PUBLISHED BY HEADLINE. CLICK PIC BELOW!
You might also like...
-
Here are the major storylines for the week ahead on Coronation Street, all wrapped up nicely in 50 words or less. Monday 31 March to Friday ... -
Wednesday 26 March 2025 WHO WAS IN THE FIRING LINE? In the hospital waiting room, there’s an anxious wait. Who took the gunshot and more imp... -
Tuesday 25 March 2025 ROB HOLDS CARLA HOSTAGE On Rob’s orders, Tracy calls Carla and making out she’s got a business proposition, asks her t... -
Good evening. I never seem to know if I am going to be here or not. And then when I am I was somewhere else. Daisy is fuming that Jenny h...
-
Friday 28 March 2025 JENNY TAKES HER EYE OFF THE BALL As Daisy ruminates over Jenny’s recent windfall and wonders how long she intends to ke... -
Coronation Street’s Dee Dee Bailey is at the centre of dramatic scenes next week when serious complications during the birth of her baby put... -
The news is finally out - how are you enjoying your time on Coronation Street? It's been so muc...
-
With new producer Kate Brooks' name now appearing in the show's credits, we've entered a new era for Corrie. I travelled to Coro... -
Monday 31 March 2025 DEE-DEE’S PAIN IS DANGEROUSLY DISMISSED At the hospital, Dee-Dee reassures Lauren that Frankie’s stem cell transplant w... -
Since becoming a series regular, firm fan favourite, Corrie Copper DS Lisa Swain, has had her character's backstory swiftly fleshed out...
Coronation Street Books for Fans
GRITTY SAGAS BY CORRIE BLOG EDITOR GLENDA YOUNG, PUBLISHED BY HEADLINE. CLICK PIC BELOW!
7 comments:
it was writing in all the lies with Carla and peter that caused the verdict to swing franks way,
Had the trial been written more accurately, it would have been a snoozer. Carla is a totally unsympathetic character, a snobby serial home wrecker with no friends and a weakness for drink. The only way to make the trial work, dramatically, was via all the OTT nonsense. Had she kept her hands off Peter, remained friends with Leanne and shared her struggle with therapy instead of running of to LA, then, maybe, a realistic trial would have worked. As it is, I just don't care, and would rather see Dierdre and Ken's struggle with their horrible offspring.
I also think, or at least hope, the audience can distinguish between reality and television.
When have the writers ever bothered with legal accuracies?
Whatever moves the storyline to the conclusion they want regardless of how lame it is, for example buying a business or a house in five minutes without ever leaving the street, getting a job or renting a flat on the street when you've only just arrived on the street.
Legality has nothing to do with it and yet they try to tell us that it is an accurate account of life in that part of Britain.
Soaps used to send out a message that if you committed a crime you wouldnt get away with it, but things have now changed and its all about ratings and sensationalism. Having Cheryl go back to her wife beater husband and having Tracy let out of prison after bashing her boyfriend's head in without learning any lessons as examples. It was totally ridiculous and unbelievable that Peter couldnt keep it in his pants for a few days until after the trial.
I do agree that with rape trials, they have a greater responsibility to at least *try* to make it accurate. Yes, it's fiction, but given the floods of phone calls that various help lines have gotten after certain storylines (Whitney and Kat in EE for one), soaps have a responsibility to try to portray stories like this accurately..
Rebecca in TO
Most people do not have experience of the courts and so will just imagine that victims are routinely harrassed by their attackers outside court and the defence barrister in court. Why should they think that Coronation Street is just lying about this?
After the trial the prosecution barrister said that it's hard enough to get women to report rape as it is. The writers must be very proud that they have contributed to making it even harder. I won't be participating in voting for Coronation Street to get any awards, except one for helping even more rapists to get away with it.
As someone who works in a court please be assured that defence QC's are not ever allowed to speak to rape victims like that and they give their evidence with no members of the public present
Routine harassment right outside the court building wouldn't be tolerated either
This storyline was enough to put real rape victims off reporting their crime!!!
Post a Comment