Last year I conducted audience research
as part of my MA in Film and Television studies. My project was entitled Coronation Street: A Survey of Fan
Engagement and Viewership, and I thought I’d share some of my findings with
you. Our blogger Graeme recently wrote an interesting
piece on spoilers, and as I have been considering writing on the topic myself, and this was a specific section in my survey, I thought where
better to begin?
To spoil, according to the Oxford English
Dictionary, is to “diminish or destroy the value or quality of” something, and a
spoiler is defined, amongst other things, as “a description of an important plot development…which if previously known may reduce surprise or suspense for a first-time viewer or reader”. Where film and television drama is concerned,
revealing too much or ruining the ending for others is a big no no, but this is not the case with soap opera. Indeed, spoilers are
generally considered a positive thing, and have long been part of the discourse
which surrounds them with the programme makers themselves actively releasing
information on upcoming storylines. This makes the spoiler an interesting
phenomenon when it comes to soap, and something that has become particularly
prolific.
When it comes to Coronation Street
Of my 339 respondents, 237 (69.91%) were female and 102 (30.09%) were male. 43.95% (149) confirmed that they did
read spoilers and made a point of doing so while a marginally greater number,
48.67% (165), only read them sometimes, and don’t go out of their way to do so.
Amazingly, only 25 people (7.37%) of the 339 claimed to never read them. Male
and female figures in respect of this and other questions on this topic did not
deviate much from one another. Spoilers are therefore consumed by 93% of my
respondents. But with less than half actually seeking them out, what do the viewing
public actually think of them?
Those who responded negatively to spoilers had some interesting and sophisticated insights. Some felt that there was too much information released, and watch in hope that something will appear that they won’t have been expecting. These viewers felt that the volume of spoilers was such that watching the show could almost be considered redundant. They felt that if there was less revealed, their enjoyment and engagement with the show would be greater. It has been interesting to observe some unexpected twists in the interim such as Tracy
Of those that do read spoilers, the main reason
is curiosity and nosiness. A number stated that they wanted to see if what they
thought would happen would occur, and also, to see how the storyline would be
handled. Spoilers are also a source of excitement for some and used as a means
of watching on a selective basis for others, with their choice as to whether or
not to tune in motivated by storylines as well as characters. They also act as
a substitute if the viewer, such as those abroad, can’t see the programme, but
one very interesting observation revealed that spoilers are possibly the reason
they are watching less.
Some use spoilers to see when a storyline they
aren’t enjoying is likely to end. Others appear interested in which characters
will feature and how they are going to be interacting with one another. A
number claimed they enhanced their anticipation and viewing pleasure.
One respondent pointed out that an exception to
wanting to know an outcome would be in the case of a “whodunit”. It’s an
interesting observation, as it is clear that these are very seldom revealed in
advance thus retaining the element of surprise and suspense, the ‘Who Killed
Tina?’ storyline being a perfect example from 2014.
Some read spoilers to allay fears as to what a
character might do and others use them as discursive currency, being the first
to be able to tell work colleagues, friends and family what’s going to happen.
Others read them out of fear that they will hear about the action from someone else.
Some acknowledged that nothing compares to watching the actual
programme, so while they read them, spoilers cannot fully reveal how a
performance will be delivered or a storyline played out on screen. Of the small percentage that don’t read them, a number
claimed it ruined Coronation Street
for them and some preferred to guess what would happen.
In the event that a viewer was feeling disappointed with an upcoming storyline,
an impressive 80.53% (273) said they would watch anyway. 12.09% (41) indicated
they would take to social media, internet message boards and fansites to
complain with 8.85% (30) complaining to others in person. Such a low percentage
of complainants is perhaps an indicator of viewer loyalty. In any event,
disliking what is to come has a minimal impact on viewership with only 17
respondents (5.01%) indicating that they would stop watching until an
undesirable story concluded.
With spoilers being consumed by the multitude,
I think we can certainly anticipate their continuance. Perhaps the fact that
spoilers exist at all makes unexpected twists all the more exciting when
they do occur, and maybe a regular combination of the two would make for an interesting viewing experience. I'd like to express my sincere gratitude to anyone who completed the survey. I hope you have found this blog on what I find to be an
intriguing phenomenon interesting, and I hope to cover other areas of my research in the near future.
By Emma Hynes
Twitter: @ELHynes
All original work on the Coronation Street Blog is covered by a Creative Commons License
