Friday 28th June 2024
GEMMA’S PROBLEMS NEED A REPAIR KIT Kit is shocked to see Gemma being brought into the police station having been arrested for stealing the shoes. Bernie begs Kit to do what he can to secure Gemma’s release. Kit calls at the shoe shop and explains to Bruce that he’s here about the shoplifting incident, can he get Gemma off. Gemma is intrigued to know why Kit wanted to help her and introduces him to Chesney and the kids. Whilst there Kit gets a shocking call from his dad.
BUSINESS GETS IN THE WAY OF PLEASURE FOR JOEL Whilst Dee-Dee gets ready for their engagement lunch, Joel furtively takes a call from Sabrina’s mate, telling him he has to meet her or he’ll regret it. What do they want?
GLENDA DIVIDES AND CONQUERS When Glenda bangs on about the situation with George and how she wants what’s rightfully hers, Michael’s disapproval is evident and Glenda senses he’s cooling towards her. Glenda calls at the undertakers and suggests to George that if he gives her his house she will drop the case. Will she agree?
ELSEWHERE Sally calls at the cab office and tells Tim she’s off into town to buy a new outfit for tomorrow. Steve listens, more convinced than ever that Tim’s planning a surprise party for him. When Amy reveals that Tracy’s cancelled her visit and she’s staying in Spain, Steve’s secretly gutted, his plans to win her back, up in smoke. In the Rovers, Steve quizzes Cassie, Kevin and Tyrone about his surprise party. They deny all knowledge and Steve smiles to himself, convinced they’re bluffing. Abi explains to Kevin that she needs to get away for a few days and she’s going to stay with Lynsey and the twins. As Abi heads out, Kevin does his best to remain positive.
4 comments:
Well done Michael. Glenda is completely unreasonable now. Is George's house work a lot more than Eileen's? If Eileen/ Sue decides to leave Corrie, she could move to George's house with him and be an invisible character. Glenda could have Eileen's house with Todd and Mary(?) as lodgers
If Glenda decides to pursue her claim against George and the judge finds that their dad's will is not legally binding and that she accepted a cash settlement from him, that means she would be in serious legal difficulty which may result in the judge dismissing her claim.
If she chose to accept a cash settlement from her brother, then what is the point of her pursuing her claim against him in court? It just doesn't make any sense.
If Glenda says she's entitled to half of George's business and half of his house, then it would be her burden of proof to demonstrate that beyond a reasonable doubt and if she is unable to demonstrate that to the court's satisfaction, then how can she expect the court to come to that view?
Thanks for the legal Insight. As usual, the writers haven't done their research.
You're welcome.
Post a Comment