Cassie Williams is a barrister who has run a number of rape trials this year. She's given vent to her frustrations about the legal inaccuracies shown in Carla Connor's rape trial on Coronation Street.
Read it here.
Follow the Coronation Street Blog on Twitter and Facebook
Monday, 6 February 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You might also like...
-
Good evening. Gary comes round. He is surprised to find he is called Chesney Winter-Brown and has a wife called Gemma and comes to the con...
-
Thursday 10 July 2025 GARY HAS A NEW WOMAN BY HIS SIDE Maria calls at the station and reports Gary missing. When Kit reveals they’ve had a r...
-
Friday 11 July 2025 GARY’S NIGHTMARE CONTINUES With Gary still in hospital, his attacker tries to cover their tracks. Can Kit or Maria get t...
-
Coronation Street has released a new trailer showing a desperate Mick Michaelis on the run from prison and on a mission to reunite with his ...
-
How has Brody been feeling with all the turmoil over his dad possibly not being his dad and potentially Kit being his dad? Has he been strug...
-
Here are the major storylines for the week ahead on Coronation Street, all wrapped up nicely in 50 words or less. Monday 14 July to Friday 1...
-
I haven't played this game for a while so I thought I'd have a bash to cheer myself up. I'm playing armchair producer again. S...
-
Three Coronation Street icons have now been officially confirmed to join the star-studded line-up of An Audience with Coronation Street: Bar...
-
Voting is now open in this year's Inside Soap Awards. Vote for your Coronation Street favourites here. Glenda Young Bestselling n oveli...
-
Monday 14 July 2025 MICK IS FREE AND ON A MISSION Following news that his family are falling apart and Lou is in trouble, this dramatic epis...
7 comments:
it was writing in all the lies with Carla and peter that caused the verdict to swing franks way,
Had the trial been written more accurately, it would have been a snoozer. Carla is a totally unsympathetic character, a snobby serial home wrecker with no friends and a weakness for drink. The only way to make the trial work, dramatically, was via all the OTT nonsense. Had she kept her hands off Peter, remained friends with Leanne and shared her struggle with therapy instead of running of to LA, then, maybe, a realistic trial would have worked. As it is, I just don't care, and would rather see Dierdre and Ken's struggle with their horrible offspring.
I also think, or at least hope, the audience can distinguish between reality and television.
When have the writers ever bothered with legal accuracies?
Whatever moves the storyline to the conclusion they want regardless of how lame it is, for example buying a business or a house in five minutes without ever leaving the street, getting a job or renting a flat on the street when you've only just arrived on the street.
Legality has nothing to do with it and yet they try to tell us that it is an accurate account of life in that part of Britain.
Soaps used to send out a message that if you committed a crime you wouldnt get away with it, but things have now changed and its all about ratings and sensationalism. Having Cheryl go back to her wife beater husband and having Tracy let out of prison after bashing her boyfriend's head in without learning any lessons as examples. It was totally ridiculous and unbelievable that Peter couldnt keep it in his pants for a few days until after the trial.
I do agree that with rape trials, they have a greater responsibility to at least *try* to make it accurate. Yes, it's fiction, but given the floods of phone calls that various help lines have gotten after certain storylines (Whitney and Kat in EE for one), soaps have a responsibility to try to portray stories like this accurately..
Rebecca in TO
Most people do not have experience of the courts and so will just imagine that victims are routinely harrassed by their attackers outside court and the defence barrister in court. Why should they think that Coronation Street is just lying about this?
After the trial the prosecution barrister said that it's hard enough to get women to report rape as it is. The writers must be very proud that they have contributed to making it even harder. I won't be participating in voting for Coronation Street to get any awards, except one for helping even more rapists to get away with it.
As someone who works in a court please be assured that defence QC's are not ever allowed to speak to rape victims like that and they give their evidence with no members of the public present
Routine harassment right outside the court building wouldn't be tolerated either
This storyline was enough to put real rape victims off reporting their crime!!!
Post a Comment