People of Portsmouth – lock up your daughters, sisters, wives and mothers; beers, wines and spirits – because Peter Barlow is in town.
Actually, it’s probably
too late, such is the havoc the renowned imbiber of women and alcohol is likely
to have already wreaked on the South Coast.
What is it about The
Waterfront City that always lures Peter back? As Carla astutely observes, “he
always goes down there… he licks his wounds and then he comes back with his
tail between his legs”. A fine analogy for the dirty dog that he is.
A quick glance at Peter’s
Weatherfield-Portsmouth migration patterns on Corriepedia throws up the
following timeline:
• 2003 – with his life in
ruins after being busted for bigamy, Peter moved to Portsmouth and set up a business
there.
• 2007 – Peter returned
to Coronation Street worried about Tracy's relationship with Charlie Stubbs. When
Tracy went down for Charlie’s murder, Peter returned to his life in Portsmouth.
• 2009 – Peter entered rehab
in Portsmouth and whilst battling the booze was unable to kick his other habit
– he had a fling, cheating on Leanne (not for the last time, obviously).
• 2014 (May) – before her
death, Peter gave Tina his credit card and told her to buy train tickets so
that they could run away together and start a new life in… Portsmouth. It’s not
surprising that Peter Barlow is irresistible to women with those kind of
promises!
• 2014 (November) – to
avoid the judgement of Weatherfield residents and constant reminders of the
past, Peter abandons his son (again) to seek solace in Portsmouth (again).
Now, I’ve been to
Portsmouth – many times. It has heritage and a lot more besides but it has
never had the spiritually healing effect on me that it seemingly does on Peter
Barlow. That said, last time I was in Southsea, the Honest Politician were
offering selected pints and jägerbombs for £2.50 – a price that must compare favourably
even to The Rovers. To use Pompey parlance, you’d have to be a right dinlow to
miss out on a deal like THAT.
Portsmouth has a pub on
every corner, a fact that could seriously scupper Peter’s desire to “sort (his)
head out”. After a menacing medley of pints and jägerbombs, I boarded a bus
decked out in amazing facts from Britain’s naval history. I remember thinking
it’s no wonder that Peter Barlow is so enamoured with the home of the Royal
Navy, with whom he served for 20 years.
And you know what they
say about sailors having a girl in every port? Well, maybe Peter has an old
squeeze down there – perhaps the same woman he bunked up with after that stint
in rehab. Ah – women, wine and song – the perennial pursuits of Peter Barlow.
Will he ever really change?
I know it’s been a
fortnight now since Peter’s departure but it’s taken me that long to reflect on
the exit of my favourite ever Corrie character. It feels good to break my
silence.
I’ve always been drawn to
the duality within Peter Barlow – the Jekyll and Hyde conflict between the good
friend, father and husband he is capable of being; and the selfish and
destructive alcoholic womaniser he seems powerless to resist turning into.
At his best, Peter is a
man that other men aspire to be like (charming, cool, charismatic) but at his
worst he is someone we all fear becoming (reckless, ratty, reprehensible). He
is a brilliantly complex character played with great skill and sincerity over
many years by Chris Gascoyne. And as I always say when defending Peter Barlow –
it’s all Ken’s fault.
Peter will be missed but
as noted on Emma’s excellent exit blog (link here),
it feels the time is right, somehow, for the character to be rested and I doubt
he has ‘gone to Portsmouth’ for the last time. He will return rejuvenated at
some point, I’m sure.
But what of his exit?
Blog readers may have picked up on the scathing write-up in The Metro (read it here) which described Peter’s departure as “a dull cop
out” arguing that even Peter wouldn’t walk out on Simon, especially not since
the thought of being reunited with his son is exactly what kept him going while
inside. It makes the point that a character as fascinating as Peter deserved
more fanfare. What do you think? Was Peter’s departure a damp squib?
Perhaps it was – a bit – but
moving to Portsmouth in times of trouble is hardly out of character. And we all
know that Peter’s character, while fascinating, is also deeply flawed.
Flawed though he may be
(and who isn’t?) I still think Portsmouth’s Visitor Information Service should update
their marketing strategy. I’m no PR guru but I’ve got an idea for their next
tourism drive…
By Martin Leay
Twitter: @mpleay
Download our App | Follow on Twitter @CoroStreetBlog | Like on Facebook
All original work on the Coronation Street Blog is covered by a Creative Commons License
What a great piece!
ReplyDeleteThanks Martin!
I did feel that it was lame that he abandoned Simon again so quickly.
ReplyDeleteThere is some sense to his knowing he's vulnerable and incapable and unstable and and and, so bringing Simon along is out. Leaving him with Leanne and his street family is a sacrifice on his behalf, showing his caring and loving and unselfish side.
I agree with the loveliness of his Jekyll and Hyde character and will miss him until his return.
Until that time, Looking forward to his return when he and Simon get to work together again on some great stuff. Both are such excellent actors and characters.
That last picture is priceless! LOL
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeletePeter is one of my least favourite characters.
ReplyDeleteGoodbye and good riddance. Long may he stay away.
What a great post! Actually Portsmouth looks wonderful. I'd like to visit there.
ReplyDeleteThat last picture is awesome!!! lol lol
Wonderful! While i do find it odd on one hand that Peter would leave Simon after fighting so hard to get through it for him, Frosty is right, Peter knows he's not capable of looking after Simon just yet and if he's had to leave, then leaving Simon behind is the responsible thing to do in this situation.
ReplyDeleteI will miss Peter and Chris G who does a fantastic job with the character. I, too, blame Ken! He abandoned a small boy to Scotland when he couldn't cope on his own, not that long after the small boy lost his mum. It's clearly affected Peter deeply.
Yes Tvor, but isn't Peter doing exactly the same thing to Simon?
ReplyDeleteBoth Peter and his father talk a good game, and they've probably actually convinced themselves, but when it comes to the crunch, they each do the selfish thing. Neither of them put their children first.
ReplyDeleteis Portsmouth the farthest away you can get from Scottland in the UK? might be symbolic :)
ReplyDeleteI've been to Portsmouth/Southsea three times now and always enjoyed it. Some fascinating places to visit there.
ReplyDeleteLove the peter character.hopefully he will be back.
ReplyDeleteWe own a property in Portsmouth. I think I have now discovered the reason why my wife often wants to stay down there alone ;-)
ReplyDeleteJust keep him away from Gunwharf Quays at night where many a mini-skirted female, wander around to the pubs and clubs there !
Cheers all!
ReplyDeleteThere certainly is a sense that history will repeat itself with Peter and Simon.
It was good to hear in last night's episode that Peter has got himself a job and a flat down in Portsmouth and is apparently still on the wagon. I wonder how long that will last...
Portsmouth sometimes gets a bad press (even from my fiancée and her friends who grew up nearby) but I like it and Southsea is really cool these days.
I was pleased to see that a day after I posted this blog, my football team Tranmere Rovers beat Portsmouth 3-1! :-)